How will EU sanctions affect Russian economy? – Comment
Moscow. Farid Akberov – APA. How will the entry into force of the European Union sanctions on Russia, Ukraine crisis, as well as global economic recession and changes in oil prices affect the Russian economy? Today, it is one of the most discussed questions is Russia.
Sberbank, Bank of Moscow, Gazprombank, Rosselkhozbank, Vnesheconombank and VTB Bank also fell under the U.S. sanctions and it caused problems for them in global financial markets.
The slide in Brent prices to near $100 a barrel seriously affected the Russian financial market. As of September 16, the national currency was equal to 38.82 rubles per US dollar. The euro was worth 50.19 rubles. Ruble has been dropping against euro and dollar for 7 days.
Russian experts have commented on possible consequences of the Western sanctions in their interviews with APA’s Moscow correspondent. Senior expert of Higher School of Economics (HSE) Center of Development Nikolay Kondrashov said that the country's economy would face large-scale crisis: “If the West tightens sanctions against Russia, oil exports will drop to 50 percent. Thus, gross domestic product will fall to 8 percent in 2015.”
“HSE Center of Development has developed two scenarios for the development of the Russian economy. According to baseline projections, if taking into account sales tax and easing of sanctions, GDP will be equal to 0.8 percent in 2015. According to the second scenario, GDP will drop 2 percent in 2015. We hope that this will be due to a decrease in the growth rate of exports of goods,” said Nikolay Kondrashov.
Russian analyst Dmitry Polevoy said GDP growth would be 1.7 percent in 2015: “This forecast was made basing on the expected completion of the effects of sanctions against Russia and normalization of the Ukrainian crisis by the end of 2015.”
The experts consider that there is a high probability of intensification of geopolitical risks. The main risk is the tightening of sanctions.
“The extension of the sanctions will be possible in three directions. The first direction is about the expansion of financial restriction in the entire economy, particularly in the private sector, 25 percent drop in gas exports and the third a large scale layoff in oil exports”, said Dmitry Polevoy.
Unlike experts, Russian politicians are optimistic about the possible impact of the sanctions on the country’s economy. Assistant to the Russian president, Andrei Belausov says the Western countries have already lost about €40 billion because of the sanctions they imposed on Russia: “The losses took place even though Russia has not yet responded to the sanctions. Russia is ready to impose sanctions on a number of products imported from European countries and the US. After it takes place, it will be too difficult to estimate possible losses western countries are going to face.
“We have many non-agricultural products for which we’re not dependent on European countries. Quite the contrary, they’re more dependent on us. It’s about car exports, including used car exports as well as their spare parts, etc. Another example can be various light industrial products which we’re now able to produce on our own”, stressed the assistant to the Russian president.
Which countries’ economies are going to be seriously affected if Russia imposes sanctions on the import of those non-agricultural products?
In 2013, Russia imported cars valued at $17 billion. 70 percent had been imported from the countries that imposed economic sanctions against Russia. They are Japan, Germany, the UK and the US. As you can see, the first four are the countries imposing sanctions on Russia. If an embargo is introduced on car imports, those countries’ loss will be over $12 billion. This is just the amount of the loss calculated without imposing an embargo on RVs, trucks, vehicles for passenger transportation and spare parts.
Note that, the import of the spare parts of foreign cars, mainly from Germany and Japan, has constituted $11,5 billion in Russia in 2013.
Imports of clothing products
Russia imported clothing products worth 8,5 billion in 2013, mainly from China (44%), Turkey, Bangladesh, Belarus, and Italy. Among them, only Italy, whose share in the total import is 5.19%, is of the countries introducing sanctions against Russia.
Imports of light industrial products
If the import of light industrial products is banned, it will unlikely be catastrophic for the economy of the European countries. For example, leather products are imported to Russia from France and Italy. The volume of imports was symbolic in 2013. Thus, goods worth $ 45 million were imported from France and goods worth $ 135 million from Italy.
Imports of alcoholic beverages
A lot depends on the specific segment in alcoholic beverage segment. For example, mainly the UK exports strong alcoholic beverage products and liqueur to Russia. In 2013, Russia imports 27.80 percent of alcoholic beverage products from the UK, 19.77 percent from France, 10.97 percent from Armenia, 9.35 percent from the U.S., 3.51 percent from Finland, 1.98 percent from Germany and 1.3 percent from Italy. Market for alcoholic beverage products amounted to $1,481 billion.
Three European countries – France, Spain, Italy are leading in import of wine to Russia. These countries export to Russia 60 percent of wine that they produce. A significant part of the products imported by Russia falls on the countries which impose economic sanctions against it. This factor is a chance of Russia to respond to the Western sanctions.
However, Russian economy is impacted by not only the Western sanctions but also the fall in oil prices in the world market. Urals crude declined to $94 a barrel while Brent crude was sold at $99.2 a barrel. The oil production in Libya, drop in demand in Chinish and European markets led to a decline in oil prices. According to experts, Saudi Arabia and OPEC member countries reduce output in case of the oil price fall to $90. Russia predicted that the oil prices amount to $110 for 2014. “Reuters” estimates show that $1 drop in oil prices impacts on Russia’s budget as a loss worth $1.4 billion.
Related news releases
- 11.07.2018What happened in Ganja: Terror against State, Secularism, Religion and Stability - ANALYSIS
- 13.06.2018PACE again wants to turn Azerbaijan into a political battlefield - ARTICLE
- 08.06.2018Political analyst: Constructive negotiations impossible with a dilettante and hard-line nationalist like Pashinyan
- 01.06.2018Southern Gas Corridor: Azerbaijan has transformed from USSR’s ‘backyard’ to world’s ‘main road’ - ANALYSIS
- 18.05.2018PACE’s proposal to Samad Seyidov: ‘admit all and we will leave you alone” - ANALYSIS
- 05.02.2018Why solidarity with oppressed Kashmiris? - Article
- 15.01.2018Criteria for ‘Index of Sympathy for Americans’: Numbers of Muslims, refugees and IS militants - ANALYSIS
- 18.11.2017Such ill-mannered attitude towards Turkey ‘unacceptable’ - Azerbaijani MP
- 14.09.2017The Contract of the New Century: New opportunities to strengthen independence, political and economic stability
- 09.09.2017Azerbaijan newspaper: Obama-era stereotypes still exist in the US
- 07.09.2017Why did Israel choose Azerbaijan? - ANALYSIS
- 31.05.2017Political analyst: Trump’s letters indicate beginning of new period in US-Azerbaijan relations
- 13.03.2017Trace of "Armenian Connection" in Strasser fantasy
- 06.03.2017The Armenian Connection: How a secret caucus of MPs and NGOs, since 2012, created a network within PACE to hide violations of international law - ANALYSIS
- 19.09.2016Failed rallies that proved unworthy of being called ‘mass’ - ANALYSIS
- 24.08.2016Referendum Act: The Cabinet of Ministers could not change to locomotive of economic reforms – ANALYSE
- 24.06.2016Tseghakronism – fascist doctrine of Garegin Nzhdeh - ARTICLE
- 08.06.2016More people displaced than at any time since WW2- Global Peace Index
- 07.05.2016Sargsyan’s failed attempt of demarche against Kremlin - ANALYSIS
- 13.04.2016Helsinki Final Act – the main factor in breaking Karabakh deadlock - ANALYSIS
- 07.04.2016‘Four-day war’: Changed status quo, balance against Armenia
- 02.04.2016Azerbaijani president’s visit to Washington: Maximal use of all opportunities of essential platform for dialogue - ANALYSIS
- 11.02.2016Turkey and Israel: Rapprochement arising from mutual need - ANALYSIS
- 22.09.2015Russian military support to Syria: A second Afghanistan?
- 11.09.2015European Parliament “annexing” Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia - ANALYSIS
- 09.09.2015Europe’s migration policy: Is Schengen area regime being abolished? - ANALYSIS
- 26.08.2015Who benefits from Greece’s exit from Eurozone? - ANALYSIS
- 10.07.2015Representatives of Azerbaijani community in Nagorno-Karabakh will also address Chatham House, says FM
- 02.07.2015Expectations arising from a default in Greece - ANALYSIS
- 29.06.2015US legalizing ISIL de facto - ANALYSIS
- 22.06.2015Rebecca Vincent – problem of anti-Azerbaijani network - ANALYSIS
- 22.06.2015Western technologist’s lies proved by figures
- 18.06.2015Democracy and human rights lessons from totalitarian Poland under democracy guise - ANALYSIS
- 17.06.2015The Guardian and principles of journalism - ANALYSIS
- 10.06.2015National Endowment for Democracy - generator of coups and chaos - ANALYSIS
- 09.06.2015BBC: Anti-Azerbaijan campaign deriving from Islamaphobia
- 22.05.2015‘Good’ and ‘bad’ separatists classified by West, Azerbaijan’s right to change partners - ANALYSIS
- 27.04.201524 April: Who won? Who lost? - ANALYSIS
- 18.04.2015Human Rights Watch – joint organization of Soros and Obama - ANALYSIS
- 16.04.2015European Parliament’s resolution incapable of changing realities in the region - ANALYSIS
- 14.11.2014Downed Armenian helicopter consequence of Yerevan’s military-political provocation - ANALYSIS - PHOTOSESSION
- 24.11.2014Indirect diplomacy: Turkey’s plan of third border crossing point with Armenia - ANALYSIS
- 28.11.2014Conflicting interests of Turkey and Iran against background of Syrian crisis - ANALYSIS
- 30.06.2014Two Europes, double Europe…. - ANALYTICS
- 14.04.2014Actual international view as a result of the occupation of Azerbaijani territories
- 10.09.2013The Republic of Azerbaijan: A Model of Good Governance - ANALYSIS